RESEARCH & CONTENT PRIORITIES
How to review competing pages before planning content
Compare the public pages that answer your audience’s questions. Record what you observe, check the evidence and turn useful findings into an original content brief. This is a manual research guide; automated Competitor Research is not part of the current Seller’s Bay launch.
Free personal walkthrough with Robert Long, CEO of Seller’s Bay. No app account needed to book.
Turn a finding into a decision
Context — domain, country, language and refresh date.
Evidence — keywords, ranking pages and estimates.
Review — inspect the relevant live page.
Action — improve a useful page or prepare a distinct brief.
Choose search competitors that matter to the client.
SEO competitor analysis tools reveal websites and pages that appear for relevant searches. Search competitors may differ from the businesses your client meets offline. Start with the client’s products, services and audience, then research domains competing for the same needs in the selected market.
Business relevance
A site with overlapping keywords may be a retailer, publisher or large platform. Check whether its pages answer the same question and serve a similar audience before treating it as a useful benchmark.
Search context
Record the country, language, search query and observation date. Results from one market do not describe every country. Keep the context consistent when comparing public pages.
Read estimates, overlap and dates carefully.
Third-party search estimates are modelled figures, rather than access to a competitor’s private analytics. A search-value estimate does not establish actual advertising spend. Missing values do not mean zero.
Overlap needs interpretation
Shared keywords help identify search overlap. A large platform can overlap with many topics while being a poor business comparison. Check the individual pages and terms before choosing a content priority.
Freshness and coverage
Record the source, observation date and market beside each finding. Coverage varies between sources and countries. Revisit the relevant live page before acting on an older observation.
Advertiser competition is separate from organic ranking difficulty. Search volume, positions and estimated traffic are useful context; none of them proves that a new page will be easy to rank.
A worked comparison: answer the shopper’s missing question.
Fictional editorial example for Example Home Store. The domains and observations below are invented to show the decision process. No real owner or client rankings, traffic estimates or backlink counts are shown.
Page A: product category
Imagine a competitor category page that lists narrow bedside cabinets and links to individual products. It addresses shopping intent. If your store has suitable products, review whether your own category clearly explains dimensions and the selection.
Page B: measuring guide
Imagine a separate guide explaining how to measure the space beside a bed. It addresses a practical question. A useful supporting article could include an original measuring checklist and link to suitable products where relevant.
The decision is not to copy either page. Choose the page type that matches the reader’s need, add verified product knowledge and give each topic one clear owner. Record the source URL, observation date and proposed action when conducting a real review.
See how research becomes a practical client plan.
Bring a content question to your free walkthrough. Discuss how to turn a verified observation into a useful article or product-content brief, then see the currently available app tools.
Free personal walkthrough · One-hour booking · Choose Zoom Meeting to see the app
Explore all features or contact us with your question.